Answer:
The correct answer is option (B).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Total cost = $8,600
Total units = 400 Units
Direct labor hour per unit = 5
Variable cost = $1.50
So, we can calculate the fixed cost by using following formula:
Fixed cost = Total cost - Total Direct labor cost
Where, Total direct labor cost = $1.50 × 5 × 400 = $3,000
By putting the value in the formula, we get
Fixed cost = $8,600 - $3,000
= $5,600
Answer:
Using Traditional allocation method
Allocation rate per unit
=<u> Budgeted overhead</u>
Budgeted direct labour hours
Brass
Overhead allocation rate
= <u>$47,500</u>
700 hours
= $67.86 per direct labour hour
Gold
= <u>$47,500</u>
1,200 hours
= $39.58 per direct labour hour
Using activity-based costing
Brass
Allocation rate for material cost pool
= <u>$12,500</u>
400
= $31.25 per material moved
Gold
Allocation rate for material cost pool
= <u>$12,500</u>
100
= $125 per material moved
Brass
Allocation rate for machine set-up pool
= <u>$35,000</u>
400
= $87.50
Gold
Allocation rate for machine set-up pool
= <u>$35,000</u>
600
= $58.33
Explanation:
Using traditional allocation method, the overheads for material cost pool and machine set-up pool will be added. The overhead allocation rate per unit is the division of total overhead by the direct labour hours for each product.
Using activity-based costing, the material cost pool overhead will be divided by the material moved for each product in order to obtain allocation rate for each product.
The allocation rate for machine set-up pool is obtained by dividing the machine set-up overhead by the number of machine set-up for each product.
Answer:
Return on Investment = 17%
Explanation:
Return on Investment = Net income from investment / Investment opportunity * 100
Where Net income from investment = (Sales * Contribution margin ratio) - Fixed expenses
Net income = ($1,530,000 * 30%) - $306,000
Net income = $459,000 - $306,000
Net income = $153,000
Return on Investment = $153,000 / $900,000 * 100
Return on Investment = 17%
Answer:
They would cause relatively smaller reductions in death from heart disease.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the government incurred $45 million for research on the heart disease and gain that decreased the death occured from the heart disease. Now if the law of diminishing retuns hold, so the extra rise in expenditure on heart disease result in relatively small decline as it decreases the returns
Therefore the same is to be considered
