Answer: The first one
Explanation:
Civil Disobedience." In this essay, he argued that being moral and just came before allegiance to government. If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law."
An explanation of how a value judgment would have no objective truth because there is a difference in opinion/perspective.
<h3>What is an Objective Truth?</h3>
This refers to the truth that is spoken without the <em>use of bias</em> that is accurate.
Hence, we can see that a value judgment is the assessment of a thing as being good or bad based on the standards and priority of a person.
A factual statement on the other hand is either true or false and would remain the same, irrespective of perspectives or opinions.
Read more about objective truths here:
brainly.com/question/17133736
#SPJ1
Answer: The answer is A) I'm packing my suitcase.
Hope this helps :D
What I know about pronoun antecedent agreement is that when the pronoun agrees in number (referring to singular or plural) and person (referring to first, second, or third person) with its antecedent. Pronouns should agree in number, person, and gender with their antecedents. If the antecedent is singular, the pronoun should be singular. If the antecedent is plural, the pronoun should be plural.
Message me and i will send you a old story i have