1. The English test is taken to assess the <em><u>writing, reading and speaking skills </u></em>of an applicant. Hence, the test is can be extensive, that can including writing essay, comprehension passages as well as a general interview.
There are a couple of exceptions. Applicants who are aged 50 and above, do not have to take the test, if they have lived in the United States for at least 20 years at the time of application.
However, they do have to give the Civics Test
2. The Civics test is conducted to ensure that the applicant understands the basics of the United States government, democracy and rights given to all people.
This can also include questions on the American Revolutionary War, three parts of the government and general history of the United States.
Unlike an English test, a Civics test is compulsory. However, the test is customized for each applicant depending on their age, background , education etc.
<span>In a representative democracy the power of government officials is primarily checked by "C. another branch," since this is what is referred to as "checks and balances". </span>
We should know about this because American Citizens need to know how we won the war.
Answer:
<u><em>I do not believe that my city should be sovereign. Sovereignty is the right to govern yourself in a completely independent way. Countries are usually considered to be completely sovereign. However, I believe it is not a good idea for a city to be completely sovereign, because this comes with many responsibilities in terms of political, social and economic commitments that a city would not be able to handle effectively.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Answer: Secondary historical sources.
Explanation:
Two types of sources, primary and secondary, have generally been represented in history. The primary sources are artefacts, documents, records, and other raw, source material, and they serve primarily as a source of information for the historian.
Secondary sources include quotes, comments and the like. For many historians, secondary sources create problems, they may be useful, but they need to be correctly interpreted. Because of their form, they are subject to change (because the quotation can be distorted over time and get another meaning), so they should be carefully handled. Therefore, they are distrustful of context and unreliable for proof.
