Answer:
In the Amazons, plants and trees are provided with more nutrients and they tend to grow much better.
Explanation:
In the African Savanas, there is mostly dry lands, so it’s harder to find a source of water for the plants and trees. But in the Amazon, there is plenty of nutrients and there are many water resources for the plants to use. So, the climates in the Amazon are much greater and keep the plants growing tall, than in the African savanna.
Hope this helps :D
DNA fingerprinting is far more conclusive because it is solid proof. It has evidence that a certain person was at a certain place at a particular time frame. Although most criminals do get asked to use the polygraph test, testing guilt I guess, measures only their heart rate. Which in a normal view many regular people would be nervous. There has been countless reports where murders can pass a polygraph test, but then be convicted of a crime due to proof of evidence from fingerprints. Humans are emotional beings, some can crack easily while some won't (through interrogation). So that's why it's key investigations use science to back up their crimes rather that try to measure someone's guilt.
I hope this answered your question!
Answer:
C. Polar
Explanation:
The city Q is most likely to be present in the polar region. The polar climate regions do not have any warm summers. The average temperature in a polar region is predicted to be less than 10 °C. About 20% of the earth is known to have the polar climate. Annually, less than 25 cm rain or precipitation is noted in the polar region. Hence, the city Q is most likely to be located in the Polar region.
B. Because heterogeneous is two different letters basically.
I’m pretty sure it’s called an EKG, or something close to that.
