1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sasho [114]
2 years ago
10

An effect of the new territory acquired by the US after the Mexican-American War was that states disagreed about

History
2 answers:
Nana76 [90]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

whether slavery should be allowed in Mexican territory.

Explanation:

lara31 [8.8K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:  States disagreed about whether slavery should be allowed in the new territories.

Explanation:

The Mexican Cession was the large region of land that Mexico ceded to the United States in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848.  It included territory that would later become the states of California, Nevada, Utah, and parts of what would become Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.  The Mexican Cession reignited tension on the issue of slave-holding states vs. free states.

The Missouri Compromise (1820) had admitted Missouri into the Union as a slave state with Maine being added at the same time to keep the balance of slave and free states equal.  It also prohibited any future slave states north of the latitude line 36 1/2 degrees north of the equator in territories of the Louisiana Purchase, with the exception of Missouri (north of that line) being admitted as a slave state.  Since that latitude line ran right through the middle of the Mexican Cession territory, there was bound to be further debate over the issue of slave vs. free states.

You might be interested in
What are some ways that nationalism affected networks and production and distribution?
alukav5142 [94]

Nationalism is the identification with one's own nation and to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations. Hence the effect is negative.

<h3>Effect of nationalism on networks, production and distribution</h3>

Nationalism affect networks, production and distribution in such a way that a significant proportion of consumers will not be willing to buy imported produce from countries that are in conflict with theirs. Hence, those whose ethnocentric and economic-centric relationship are strong would exhibit this trait.

The implication is that networking of good to to such country will be distorted, low production may set in, and by extension, distribution may need to follow other channels.

Therefore, the effects will be enormous and very negative to the producing countries.

learn more about nationalism: brainly.com/question/1287645

7 0
1 year ago
Plz help me in this math​
deff fn [24]

Answer:

i) 4÷24=1 by6 ii)6÷12=1 by 2 iii)3÷9=1 by3

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The ______________ was the most successful form of colonial protest because the British government repealed various taxes after
harina [27]
I'm 99% sure the answer is The Boston Tea Party
4 0
3 years ago
How do you think George Washington would have felt about the Monroe Doctrine? Would have have supported it or been against it?
k0ka [10]
George Washington had warned the American people against “the insidious wiles of foreign influence.” President Monroe, writes Arnold Whitridge, further developed “the thesis of non-entanglement.
7 0
2 years ago
John Locke believed there was a social contract between a government and its people. What were the details of this contract?
mina [271]

Answer:

The answer is letter A. Citizens should agree to obey their government as long as the government protected their natural rights.

Explanation:

John Locke was an influential philosopher, political theorist and physician of the <em>17th century.</em> He was known for his "Social Contract theory" which states that <u>the citizens in the country can stop following or obeying their government if it fails to secure the people's natural rights. </u>His theory supported the<em> state or people, rather than the government. </em>

He also focused on the <em>people's natural rights</em> by saying that the people have the right to overthrow the government, when the need arises. It also means that the government cannot have an absolute control over the people. They have to do their obligations to the citizens, so that the citizens will also do their obligations to the government.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the name for Jewish places of worship and teaching? A. churches B. synagogues C. ziggurats D. mosques
    10·2 answers
  • In the seventh century, who ultimately defeated the eastern turks?
    14·1 answer
  • Does James I make a good case for divine right? Why or why not?
    7·1 answer
  • Who is England's legislative body?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the Delian League? A : an organization of Greek women who supported the soldiers in their quest for victories over enem
    10·1 answer
  • The fourth-century Kushan pendant reflects the influence of a. Islam, Christianity, and Hellenistic culture. b. Manichaeism, Jud
    11·1 answer
  • How are the petition of right and the bill of rights similar?How are they different ?​
    5·1 answer
  • What major colonial city was betsy roos from
    11·2 answers
  • Help me with this question please ⚠️⚠️
    11·1 answer
  • Why did europeans believe that imperial conquest was the right thing to do?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!