Hi there!
The principle of SOCIAL CONFORMITY.
It showed that people tend to engage behaviours more likely in confirmation of the society at large.
The interesting question is when everybody is thinking about confirming then who decide what behavior to engage in, from the start? That is if we are supposed to DRINK in a Social gathering when all are drinking. Then who thought that Drinking is to be done by all, or who sets the social norm and how is the degree of strictness understood and enforced?
is it something we just think and that the norms doesn't actually exist?
Some food for thought!
hope it make sense!
Answer:
<em><u>Culture is by far our primary method for adapting to the environment today. Culture allowed our ancestors to thrive and spread into new areas. Humans first lived in the tropics and were physically adapted for a warm climate. In fact, in terms of their biology, humans are still tropical animals.</u></em>
That would be the treaty of paris.
A total war is when there are no restrictions on weapons used, the territory or warriors involved, or the objects pursued.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't know what Answer A really is. Usually there is a numbered section preceding the clause. The clause does not stand by itself -- or nothing I've seen does that.
Article 4 section 5 clause 3: This part of the constitution tells how the constitution may be amended. To amend or change anything about the constitution requires a procedure. This then is the procedure.
I think the answer you want is B. The wording is "To Constitute Tribunals inferior to the the Supreme Court." This whole section 8 Article I has to do with the powers given to congress. Clause 9 is just one of these powers.
