Answer:
For not receiving any financial help from the grantees, senator Kauffman hands were not tied neither was he unburdened or pressured by the outside forces to undermine the white collar crime investigations.
Step-by-step explanation
In the US the elites that is the political class, bankers and the individual funders do have influence over the State representatives due to their huge donations used in campaigns. In this case Senator Kaufman did not campaign but rather was appointed hence he did not receive any financial help from any third party, therefore his only commitment was to deliver the work he was appointed for.
This differs from other leaders because their allegiance is swayed as they try to please their donors for example; elected officials who received donations from NRA went against the bills that would limit their access to particular weapons.
Answer:
a Courtroom Workgroup
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the concept that describes this is known as a Courtroom Workgroup. Like mentioned in the question this term refers to an informal arrangement or relationship that exists in a courtroom between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer.
The environment in New England was incredibly variable, with sweltering summers and frigid winters. Native Americans of New England learned to exploit the seasonal diversity by practicing mobility
Psychology is best described as the study of human thought and behavior.
It's called a moral Judgment
In this context, we don't make a decision based on what will benefit us the most, we make it because it's the right thing to do
For example we just found out that our company's waste is destroying the environment. If we're using our moral judgement, we will immediately stopped all productions despite the loss it may bring to our company
