Both the ancient Greeks and Phoenicians extensively colonized vast areas of Europe, along the Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts. In doing so, they spread their culture, which strongly influenced the local tribes. For the Greeks, this is called “Hellenization”.
The Supreme court is saddled with the responsibility to decide if a law violates the Constitution or not. Such procedure is known as "judicial review".
- The process is used to provide checks and balances on the legislative and executive branches of government.
- Any law endorsed by the Supreme Court is constitutional, thus, they can be used at the Federal and all State level of government
- However, if the Supreme court announce that a law is unconstitutional, no entity must abide to the law because the Supreme power of the Court reigns.
In conclusion, an law that is stated to be constitutional can be written and used under the State law.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/17746547</em>
I believe the answer is Merton.
Merton believe that all individuals will feel a certain level of struggles in every society because of the pressure to adapt to society's standard and the willingness to pursue our own standard.
He believed that become someone with great power/influence are the people that able to transform other people's standard to allign with their own.
Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
A. a punishment or the threat of punishment used to enforce conformity.