She would be most likely to fail because there are other things in her mind that she is thinking about that are more present in her mind.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
The Whig party was a party active in the US in the 19th century, which was similar to today's Republican party, and in fact the Republican party was partially created by the members of the Whig party. It's ideology was Liberalism and Protectionims (limiting trade with other countries).
In some research, the researchers are not able to use random assignments to divide participants among groups. Instead, they compare preexisting groups, which results in a quasi-experimental design.
Random assignments are those which are given as a matter of chance to ensure fairness and equal opportunity for all participants. Here participants forming multiple groups are with similar characteristics. So all groups are the same at the start of the experiment.
A quasi-experimental design applies a non-random method, and subjects are assigned to preexisting groups. There are some situations where true experiments can't be used for practical reasons. In such cases, a quasi-experimental design is a suitable tool.
To learn more about quasi experimental design here
brainly.com/question/28145500
#SPJ4
