Answer:
Taking more samples from different parts of an acre.
Explanation:
Validity and accuracy of the data is crucial for any serious research. In this particular case, the most accurate data would be obtained if earthworms would be counted on the whole acre. Of course, this would consume lot of time, people, money etc. That's why methods for estimation are used. Estimation best works with large number of samples. Since one acre equals over 4000 square meters, taking only five samples from such a big area is simply not enough for obtaining valid data.
One of the possible ways to improve estimation is to take more samples per acre while avoiding taking adjacent samples because it could be possible that number of earthworms in one part of an acre is increased (or decreased) for any reason, which would lead us to wrong conclusion.
Answer:
I think climate change can be either fake or real. I do believe temperatures are rising, but if you look at the history of the earth, it's gone through many ice ages and changes, so I would assume that it is no big deal. There is no evidence that temperatures are rising at a deadly rate, but weather has been unpredictable for a while now. Then again, these are my thoughts on climate change, so I'm not sure if I'm right or wrong. Hope I gave some useful information!
Explanation:
You end up with a polyploid condition. Not uncommon in organisms, especially plants, like angiosperms.
Look up "polyploidy".
<span>They are mechanoreceptors that detect pressure, and are found in the skin and also in joints and tendons. Naked nerve endings lie in the centre of the corpuscle surrounded by concentric layers of connective tissue separated by viscous gel.
Looks like an onion.
</span>
