The answer to the question above is letter C. The income that is not used for consumption is called a SAVINGS. Saving consist of the amount left over when the cost of a person's consumer expenditure is subtracted from the amount of disposable income he or she earns.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Jason will get the raise because even though he is new he works hard like he's been there for years. Matt will not get it because even though he has worked there for a while he doesn't do his job good.
Explanation:
When a manager needs to make a decision using the ethical decision-making process and reaches the second stage, they check whether the decision violates the c. fundamental rights of any stakeholders
The ethical decision-making process involves making decisions that are consistent with the relevant ethical views of the company which it draws from the society it is based in.
The second stage of this process involves checking whether the ethics involved in a certain decision, would violate the fundamental rights of shareholders which include:
- The right to ownership
- The right to Dividends
- The rights to evaluate corporate decisions
- The right to voting power
This is to ensure that the shareholders are taken care of because the first duty of a manager is to their shareholders.
In conclusion, managers need to check whether a decision affects the fundamental rights of shareholders before they embark on it.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/8864856.</em>
<em />
The options for this question include:
a. utilitarian beliefs
b. the global commons
c. the fundamental rights of any stakeholders
d. home country values
Answer:
$85
Explanation:
Costco Medical Supply's inventory:
Surgical Eq - Surgical Supp - Rehab Eq - Rehab Supp
Selling price $260 $100 $340 $165
Cost $170 $90 $250 $162
Costs to sell $30 $15 $25 $10
If we apply the net realizable value rule, the value of surgical supplies would be:
NRV = $100 = $15 = $85
the NRV is also the lower of cost since $85 < $90
Answer:
a) attached below.
b) for $x < $5000 will cause taking the drug to be part of the Nash equilibrium
c) will make the athletes feel better because the value their payoff will increase
Explanation:
<u>a) 2 * 2 payoff matrix describing the decision faced by the athletes </u>
attached below
when both players take the drug the payoff for each player = $5000 - x
when neither player takes the drug the payoff for each player = $5000
When only one player takes the drug his payoff = $10000 - x
<u>b) If we consider the value of $x to be involved in the Nash equilibrium then </u>
; $5000 - $x > 0 becomes the best response
hence for $x < $5000 will cause taking the drug to be part of the Nash equilibrium
c) Lowering the negative effect of the drug ( i.e. when the value of x is reduced )
will make the athletes feel better because the value their payoff will increase
