Answer:
0.1631 ; 16.31%
Explanation:
Given:
Cost of capital = 14% = 0.14
Debt to equity ratio = 60% = 0.6
Cost of debt = 9% = 0.09
Tax rate = 23% = 0.23
Cost of equity : cost of capital + debt - to - equity ratio * (1 - tax rate) * (cost of capital - cost of debt)
Cost of equity = 0.14 + 0.60 × (1 - 0.23) × (0.14 - .09)
Cost of equity :
0.14 + 0.60 * 0.77 * 0.05
0.14 + 0.0231
= 0.1631 ; 0.1631 * 100% = 16.31%
Answer:the correct answer is A. For the 11th worker, the marginal profit is $600.
Explanation:
10 men 20 vanities per week
11 men 22 vanities per week
1 man more 2 vanities more
If the company uses 1 man more produces 2 vanities more, so the company spends $1000 on the extra man and makes 2*$800= $1,600 (for two extra vanities). For the 11th worker, the marginal profit is = $1600-$1000= $600
Answer:
B) The money they saved in the past is worth less in the future
Explanation:
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
The principal duhhh dumb add jhit
