They teach this because the same situation will
happen time after time.
<span>
<span>UPS founders wanted to stick to the same procedures and this
will also help the drivers in their decision-making skills. UPS procedure of
handling a package consist a twelve-step process which needs to be completed in
15.5 seconds, this kind of programmed decision help the company move forward.</span></span>
<span>Boys' play tends to come in bursts rather than in more extended, tranquil episodes, due in part to </span>their concern over dominance hierarchy, known as restrictive play
For nonviolent drug offenders whose underlying problem is substance use, drug treatment courts combine the power of the judicial system with effective treatment services.
Fundamental to the powerful operation of drug courts are coordinated control, monitoring, and evaluation structures.
The justice gadget refers drug offenders into treatment through a diffusion of mechanisms, inclusive of diverting nonviolent offenders to treatment; stipulating treatment as a situation of incarceration, probation, or pretrial launch; and convening specialized courts, or drug courts, that cope with drug offense cases.
The cause of the judicial system courts is to use authority of court docket to reduce through converting defendant's drug-the usage of behavior, hyperlink offenders with community based remedy, and free up courts for more serious offenders. Drug Courts A unique court given the responsibility to handle instances regarding drug-addicted offenders thru an extensive supervision and remedy application.
Learn more about judicial system here:- brainly.com/question/12694841
#SPJ4
Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
