<span>A result of the intensity and magnitude of the hurricane it damaged the pipeline. Gasoline distributors affected the prices because of the loss of supply and the unstable transportation or delivery. Stability of prices or equilibrium was achieved after reconstruction and changes that had transpired. Expected prices hikes on products would also be seen afterward.
</span>
Answer:
compares the efficiency and effectiveness of your business processes against strict standards.
Explanation:
Benchmarking is a process of measuring the performance of a company’s products, services, or processes against those of another business considered to be the best in the industry, aka “best in class.” The point of benchmarking is to identify internal opportunities for improvement.
The cost of underestimating the demand is considered a revenue loss that arises due to cancellation of flight costing $134. Hence, cost of underetimating the demand is

.
The cost of overestimating the demand is known as rewards. For example, free round trip ticket worth $263. Hence, the cost of overestimating the demand is

.

The z-score that yields a p-value of 0.3375 is -0.4193.
Thus, super discount airlines should overbook the flight by 35 + (-0.4193 x 24) = 35 - 10.0632 = 24.9368 = 25 seats.
Therefore, super discount airlines should overbook the flight by 25 seats.
Answer:
C) There was no price control on gasoline at the time.
Explanation:
During the 1970s the US government established a price ceiling on gasoline, but as all price ceilings set below the equilibrium price, it results in both a deadweight loss and a supply shortage.
Since the price is "too cheap", then the quantity demanded will be more than the quantity supplied. Rising costs in gasoline production made things worst, since suppliers were constantly reducing their supply of gasoline, while consumer demand was constantly increasing.
Answer:
C. VL = VU + PV(Tax Shield) - PV(CFD)
Explanation:
The static trade off theory is a theory of capital structure in corporate finance, first proposed by Alan Kraus and Robert H. Litzenberger. The theory emphasizes the trade-offs between the tax benefits of increasing leverage and the cost of bankruptcy associated with higher leverage. The <u>answer is C</u> as we know relative to the unleveraged firm, leverage provides both costs and benefits. The benefits are the tax shields provided by debt.