Answer:8 barrels of oils per pair of shoe
Explanation:Greece and swizerland will need an average price by which they can both gain from trade.To ascertain the average price is by adding the 4 barrels of oil which Greece can forfeit and the 10 barrels of oil which Switzerland could also forfeit if it were into producing shoes.10+ 4 = 14/2 which almost 8 barrels to be given in exchange in other ensure a fair trade between both trading partners.
Answer:
A. an increase in the price level (inflation)
Explanation:
When there is an unanticipated increase in aggregate demand it usually result in the general increase in the price level of that good demanded (inflation). This is because when there is an unpredicted increase in demand for a good, the demand becomes higher than the supply for that good at that particular period. Because the supply is now less than the aggregate demand, the prices of the commodity is then increased to discourage demand. The increase in the price of the commodity (inflation) therefore is a direct result from the increase in the aggregate demand for that commodity.
Answer:
The explanation is below
Explanation:
A. Shutdown point is achieved when price equal AVC. when price lowers than the AVC, firm shutdown.
VC = q^2
AVC = q
So,
P = q is the shutdown point.
B. For profit maximizing level of output,
P = MR = MC
500 = 20 + 2q
q = 240 units
So, profit maximization level of output = 240 units
C. Firm level supply curve = MC curve above the shutdown point
Number of firms = 5
So,
Industry supply curve = 10*MC = 200+20Q
Industry supply curve = 200+20Q
It shows that MC curve above the shutdown point is supply curve.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Depreciation is the uniform decrease in the value of an asset over a period until the salvage value is reached.
It is given by :
Annual depreciation expense = (cost of asset - salvage)÷ useful life of the asset
Therefore the accumulated depreciation would not equal the original cost of the asset at the end of its estimated useful life because the salvage value will be deducted from cost of asset under declining-Balance.
Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
