I believe the answer is; a<span> leader-exchange theory
The theory suggest that every time leaders make interactions with their subordinates, those subordinates would become more understanding of the leader's expectation and vision, which make them become more responsible and trustworthy for the leaders.</span>
The appropriate response is letter B. The Mayans had a few cultivating strategies they used to develop their harvests, including the cut and consume strategy, terracing and a system utilizing raised fields. The technique utilized by the ranchers relied upon the land. Maya agriculturists utilized a strategy called cut and consume before they started planting crops.
The correct answer is generosity, fairness.
Values refer to an individual's idea of what is right and ethical in life. Values also set standards for an individual's behavior and conduct. Generosity refers to a value where a person believes in sharing, giving and extending oneself to help others. The value of fairness refers to when a person believes in equality, justice and parity for everyone.
Answer:
Actors are very good at being able to express emotions for a variety of situations. It can safely be assumed that these actors would score high on measures of emotional intelligence.
Explanation:
<u>Emotional intelligence consists of perceiving, managing, understanding and using emotions. Usually, people who are good at expressing emotions in varied situations score high on emotional intelligence, which is the case with actors. Emotional intelligence also helps people deal with everyday situations and difficulties, since they can better manage their reactions and decisions. </u>For instance, you feel like playing video games with your siblings, but instead you choose to study for an important test. That is a sign of emotional intelligence.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
