The correct answer is Lewis Henry Morgan
Recognized as one of the founders of modern scientific anthropology, Lewis Henry Morgan was the first to study kinship systems and devised an ambitious theory about man's cultural evolution.
Morgan developed a general theory of the cultural evolution of society, which would take place in three stages: savagery, barbarism and civilization, each marked by the predominance of certain techniques and institutions. The acquisition of a new technique or capacity would mark the end of one stage and the beginning of the next. Thus, the invention of ceramics started barbarism, and writing, civilization.
Although Morgan's theories have revealed themselves over time to be excessively linear and incomplete, his proposal of direct examination of primitive communities and the integration of different cultural, economic and historical factors lent anthropology rigor.
According to my knowledge this is the answer:
Rule of law is one of the most important pillar of Constitution.
Rule of Law is something which opposes common man's rule and supports Government's rule. This is actually necessary for maintaining peace and stability in democratic countries like India.
- How can photos be used as alternate forms of argument?
It can be used as a visual proof to convince others about your point.
Argument often derived from personal conviction. This personal conviction often really hard to get rid off even if the oppositions provides a clear and logical argument to debunk it.
Visual proof often harder to deny since it can depict a certain situation in a more convincing way rather than personal recollection . Often times, this can be a lot stronger compared to trying to convince others simply by using words.
- Can a photo convince you to take a specific action or to think a certain way?
Absolutely.
For example, Let's say that you hear 2 people arguing in the court. Person A accused person B for killing person C at December 12th. Person B denied the accusation.
At this point, you probably not really sure who's in the right.
But, let's say that<u> person B showed a photo that proved he is actually in another city</u> on December 12th and it is impossible for him to be at the crime scene on the time of person C attack.
That photo could easily win the argument in person B's favor and convince others who witness it that he is telling the truth.
