Answer:
By offering different perspective.
Explanation:
Popular historical events, tend to be written from the perspective of the 'Winners'. Even if those winners were doing something unethical during the events, they can cover it by justifying their actions through some sort of divine will or missions.
The perspective from non-European histories offered a different perspective on the colonization.
In the past, colonization's were generally praised as something good. The Europeans masked it as some sort of mission to help other countries in the world improve their civilization. But, they didn't mention the dark side of it. Only after examining non-European histories the world aware of the human exploitation, resources exploitation, and the military's conflicts that's caused by the colonization.
The west is known for their colonisation of many countries in Asia and other continents. However, not all these activities are with full acceptance. The reaction of the Asian to Western claims is in intensification of anti-imperial resistance activities and independence movements.
<h3>Asian reactions</h3>
Asian reactions to Western claims of racial and cultural superiority were strongly rooted in the practices of anti-imperialist resistance and independence movements, especially in relation to European cultures.
Therefore, in the quest of the Asia to end Western superiority, they reacted to Western claims inorder to intensify their interest.
learn more about Colonisation of Asia from here:
brainly.com/question/365379
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. indirect democracy." The form of government is the us federal government is that of indirect democracy. That is, federal government is not that showing what a democratic country is.<span>
</span>
200? Umm the newest here was the early Iron Age which was 600... but if you meant 2000 bc it would be B.THE LATE STONE AGE
