Answer:
Early Majority
Explanation:
Early Majority -
It consists of around 34% of the total population, these are the type of people, who adapts to a innovative goods or services after some varying degree of time , is referred to as the Early Majority .
They take the time period to get their hands on the new stuff is much longer time in comparison to the early adopters and innovators .
As these people smartly goes through the complete analysis of the product , all the review and wait for the price to get down and buys on the best price .
Hence, from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is Early majority.
Answer:
d. right to choose
Explanation:
By not presenting any other alternatives for acetaminophen, the pharmacist is violating the consumers' right to chose. According to this right, consumers should be provided with a variety of options of products at a satisfactory quality and competitive prices, which does not occur if they only have one brand to choose from.
The answer is alternative d. right to choose
Answer:
Option C is the right answer
Explanation:
The shark fin soup is one of the favorite foods of people and foreigners and when due to the presence of mercury in shark soup the sale of one of the favorite Thai food decline. There are various reasons for the plummeted sales, such as; social factors, people are willing to use and recommend those products only which are healthy. Similarly, political and legal enforcement led to a devastating decline of the overall demand for shark soup.
Answer:
Applewood can stop the shipment and have the goods returned (the right of stoppage of goods).
Explanation:
When the buyer becomes insolvent while the goods are in transit, and the goods have not been paid yet, then the seller has the right to stop the delivery and resume possession of the goods.
Applewood could also try to sue Marco for specific performance but considering their current position it might be useless and actually result in more money invested and larger losses.
Answer:
Taking $1 from Carl and giving it to Andy would increase society's total utility.
Explanation:
Since Andy's income is less than other three people when a $1 taken from Carl would increase Andy's utility more than the loss in utility of Carl. Thats why total utility would increase.
