Scientists should not have the ability to patent their own research methods as this prevents additionally scientific knowledge to be present within the experimental sciences. The last step of the scientific method is to communicate and share your own findings, and without the ability to do so, it prevents constructive criticisms of the method as well as improvements that would otherwise be prevented from patenting. In the field of genetic engineering specifically, the Human Genome project or (HGP) was an international scientific investigation that promoted communication between scientists rather than the restriction of scientific knowledge. The results of this international collaboration led to multitudes of information being presented regarding human genetic makeup. Therefore, patents ultimately prevent the progression of the sciences and scientific knowledge.
I dont know if there are typos but hopefully this helps.
It’s the source of all the energy from all the stars ... until their fuel is used up
A large deposit of sand and soil formed at the end of a river is a delta. When a river empties into the ocean, the current carrying smaller particles, such as soil and sand, slows down and eventually stops, causing these particles to be dropped off on the shore. This eventually leads to a triangular deposit, usually referred to as the mouth of the river.
I think its B but I'm not sure .. sorry
The appropriate response is the Olfactory Bulb. It is a mind structure in charge of our feeling of smell. Situated at the tip of the olfactory projection, the knob forms data about smells in the wake of getting tangible contribution from the nose.
The olfactory bulb is a heap of afferent nerve strands from the mitral and tufted cells of the olfactory globule that interfaces with a few target areas in the mind, including the piriform cortex, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex.
