The answer to your question would be D.Having different laws for different races. Hope this helps:)
CFCs is the answer, hope this helped you.
Answer:
Vicarious liability
Explanation:
Liability depends not on an individual's own misconduct but on that person's relationship with the wrongdoer. As per the common law of the United States, a participant of a conspiracy could be considered vicariously liable for the crimes that were committed by his co-conspirators in a case where the acts of the co-conspirators were intentional and performed in order to further the conspiracy's intent.
Answer:
The answer is b. negative reinforcement.
Explanation:
In operant conditioning, negative reinforcement is an unpleasant consequence to an action, which prevents an individual from repeating the behaviour, or encourages him to take an opposite course of action.
In the example, Matt knows the consquence of not buckling is the irratating noise, so he is more likely to do the opposite.
I'm not sure if you mean:
3/(4x) = 1/5
or
(3/4)x = 1/5
Let's do both, just to be sure.
Starting with the first one:
3/(4x) = 1/5
3 = 4x/5
15 = 4x
x = 15/4
The second:
3x/4 = 1/5
3x = 4/5
x = 4/15
