Complete Question:
Context, content and culture are:
O Important ethical concepts
O Important marketing concepts
O Corporate ethics policy
O Three dimensions of evaluating corporate gifts.
Answer:
Context, content and culture are:
O Three dimensions of evaluating corporate gifts.
Explanation:
Corporate gifts may turn out to be regarded as bribery if they are meant to induce the other party to alter their behaviors. This is why in evaluating corporate gifts, the criteria have always included the context (the circumstances in which the gifts are given), the content (how much is given), and the culture (the accepted general practice in a particular industry, locality, or region). Generally, corporate gifts are given either as means of showing appreciation, creating positive first impression, or returning some favors.
I think it's guessing from context? Hope I helped!
Answer:
e. $104,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the ending capital balance is shown below:
As we know that
Ending capital balance = Opening capital balance + net income - withdrawn amount
where,
Opening capital balance = $64,000
Net income is
= Revenues - expenses
= $100,000 - $48,000
= $52,000
And, the withdrawn amount is $12,000
So, the ending capital balance i s
= $64,000 + $52,000 - $12,000
= $104,000
Answer: 1. A.Both firms will choose the low price.
2. B. Both firms would choose the high price.
Explanation:
1. If the firms cannot cooperate with each other and must choose simultaneously, both firms will choose the low price.
This is because at the low price both of them are at the highest profit they can make when they are not cooperating. For instance, if Firm B chooses Low Price and Firm A chooses High Price, Firm A will make $3 million while Firm be will make $8 million.
If Firm B decides to have a high price then firm A will take the low price and make $8 million in profit while Firm B makes $4 million. If they are not working together, they will both have to take the low price to make the most profit.
2. If the firms could cooperate with each other, both firms would choose the high price.
The is because they will be making more than competing and getting a lower profit. Should they cooperate they will each get $7 million in profit because they will pick the option they can both make the highest profit at. The is better than competing and making only $5 and $6 million respectively.
If you need any clarification do comment. Cheers.
Answer:
Income
Explanation:
Suppose the market wage for cashiers increases from $7 per hour to $9 per hour. As a result, Pat, who is a cashier, now works five more hours per week. On the other hand Chris, who is also a cashier, now works five fewer hours per week.Chris's behavior illustrates the <u>Income</u> effect of a wage increase.
As the income increases, few individual prefer to work fewer hours as now they are able to maintain target by working fewer than at previous wage rate. These people prefer leisure over higher income and want to settle down with limited income. These people may have a backward bending individual labour supply curve – they may choose to work fewer hours when the wage rate rises.
