Answer:
could likely result in a notable loss of sales to competitors
Explanation:
In the case of the perfect competitive market wheen the price of the firm is increased from $179 to $199 as compared to the prevailing market price so this means that there should be the loss with respect to the sales for the competitors or rivalrs as this would result the firm to lose its overall shares to its rivalry
Therefore the above statement should be considered true
"Evaluative priming" refers to how quickly a person can identify an attitude object's valence when it appears right after a positive or negative image.
<h3>Define the term evaluative priming?</h3>
A technique known as a "evaluative priming exercise" (EP) uses phrases or images to prime participants before asking them to sort the words (or images) onto categories to uncover the underlying links between concepts.
- A measure of implicit attitude based on the fact that the speed of evaluating a target attitude object is accelerated by a prime (i.e., this same prior presentation of a different attitude object)
- Evaluatively consistent the with target and inhibited by such a prime which is evaluatively inconsistent also with target.
Thus, the task is a typical indicator of implicit sentiments. "Evaluative priming" measures how quickly a subject can categorize the valence of the an attitude item when it appears just after a favorable or unfavorable image.
To know more about the priming, here
brainly.com/question/23031661
#SPJ4
Answer: No, this was merely Carl's opinion.
Explanation:
Labelling a statement as an opinion generally protects the person who said it from defamation suits however this is not always the case.
If the opinion is based on disclosed and well known facts, the action is free of defamatory or libel charges.
This seems to be the case in this scenario as his column seems to be based on the performances for the year.
Bottomline is, Stella cannot sue Carl for libel as it is his opinion.
