Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
Answer:
why does andrew jackson justify the native American policy
The answer is: <span>a Preamble and eleven Articles
</span><span>The Georgia Constitution lead to the separation of Power within State of Georgia's government.
After this articles, Georgia's government is separated into Legislative, Judiciary and executive branches, and the Governor acted as the head of the Executive branches.</span>
The french were in canada
It’s B religious conflict