Yes, this is true. This is named as a speech that incites (makes people commit) imminent lawless action - that is, speech that incites violence or breaking the law.
Another exceptions to the rule of free speech are obscenity,- which is a quite controversial exception.
Answer:
If John stops leaving his room in a mess in the future, then losing his wallet has functioned as a negative punishment.
Explanation:
- Punishment is taking something that someone likes from them in order to reduce instances of occurrence of a certain unwanted behavior.
- Negative punishment is therefore the occurrence of a disliked consequence as a result of an unwanted action.
- In the above instance, John losing his wallet is negative, but it achieves a consequent desired behavior of self organization.
Answer:
That statement is true
Explanation:
A strong proof for this statement would be their irrigation system. At that time, the harrapans civilization was among the first society who manage to send water to agricultural fields that located far away from water source. (Advanced architectural and engineering skills are needed for this)
Because of this , they managed to eliminated hunger problems and continuously improve their economic strength due to the large amount of crops they're able to sell.
Answer:
no it's not necessary to make all the things public
People would basically take babies from their mother who was not married and give them up for adoption without any say in the mother
