Answer:
D. Judicial Activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
It is the opposite of Judicial Restraint, as a judicial philosophy theory, which limits the power of judges to act only as per existing legal provisions under constitution.
According to Mill, the main criticism of utilitarianism is that it is incompatible with justice.
As per Mill, utilitarianism is consistent with the key tenets of how we typically conceive about justice.
The common understanding of justice is that certain interests should be given priority; we refer to them as being safeguarded by rights.
An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasizing results. It embodies consequentialism in some way.
According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest good for the largest number of people is the most morally right one.
Mill backs up this assertion by demonstrating how all other things that people desire are either ways to achieve happiness or are part of the concept of happiness.
The sense of justice is essentially founded on utility, and rights only exist because they are required for human enjoyment, according to Mill, who goes into great detail about this.
To know more about justice, visit:
brainly.com/question/7104813
#SPJ4
Answer:
about or referring to the confluence of social and economic variables
Explanation:
Socioeconomic status is the social standing or class of an individual or group.
Answer:
Economic policies control the supply of money, while social policies manage spending.
Explanation:
