Based on the given scenario, we can see that Rachael's confession is:
- C. admissible, according to Supreme Court precedent.
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to those inalienable privileges which a human being which cannot be taken away unless under special circumstances and some of them include:
- Right to life
- Right to fair hearing
- Freedom of assembly, etc
With this in mind, we can see that Rachael waived her Fofth Amendment rights and confessed to a crime after brief interrogation by the police so this is admissible, according to Supreme Court precedent.
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/1288668
Answer:
<u>c) changing the independent variable resulted in changes in the dependent variable</u>
Explanation:
<u>Causation:</u> In psychology, the term "causation" is determined as a process that shows a specific relationship between two different variables i.e, if any changes occur in the level of one variable then it will directly cause in the level of the other variable. However, it is feasible for the two different variables to be connected with one another without of these variables causing an "observed behavior" in the another variable.
<u>In the question above, the given statement represents that option C is correct.</u>
Mesopotamian cities started as farming villages. Farming brought in surplus food and the population of the village began to grow. As the gods were the most important beings to the early Mesopotamians, priests, who mediated with the gods and divined their wills, became the most important people in the village. Slowly, priests took on a governing role.
Climate change intervened in this simple form of governance. In order for farming to continue producing adequate food, the villagers had to begin irrigating the crops. Irrigation required a substantial amount of labor in building and maintaining canals and dams. Organizing this labor required intelligent leadership. While priests were capable men, they now needed assistance from a secular leader who could guide communal labor.
By the time farming villages had grown into the great Mesopotamian cities, both priests and secular leaders were involved in governing the increasingly complex society of a city. The secular leader was called the lugal, the strongman. With specialization of labor—people finding lots of different jobs and tasks to do other than farming work—it made sense to have priests fully involved in keeping the gods happy while the lugal oversaw running the city.
Gradually the lugal became a powerful king who dominated governance of the Mesopotamian city-state. While most of his duties as king were secular, the king had religious responsibilities as well. He, as well as the high priest, was an intermediary between the gods and the people. Kings participated in religious rituals. Common Mesopotamians considered the king as the representative of the city’s patron god, the god’s overseer on earth, so to speak.
A king was expected to protect his city, to provide law, order and justice and to be a shepherd to the people, ensuring that widows and orphans were cared for. Kings formed dynasties and leadership passed from father to son. Women, in general, were not involved in politics, but there are instances of women ruling a city.
A city-state is a complex entity and running it involved a civil bureaucracy of government officials, tax collectors, scribes and ward bosses. Government officials took the tithes from farmers and other workers, they oversaw the communal labor necessary for maintaining aqueducts, irrigation canals and water resources. They assisted merchants and traders when necessary, seeing to a caravan’s protection.
Most kings sustained an active military that defended the city and went on military campaigns when the city needed more land or water resources. Kings also worked closely with the priesthood, both the en, the chief priest in charge of religious observances and the sanga, the priest involved in running the temple’s business concerns. It wasn’t until the Akkadians came to power, circa 2334 B.C., that Mesopotamian gained its first empire. For most of its history, Mesopotamian city-states each ruled its own area, ruled by a powerful king.
