Answer:
The answer is dispositional and situational, respectively.
Explanation:
A dispositional attribution judgement holds a person's internal traits as responsible for an outcome. In the example, you think the skier fell due to his lack of skills.
On the other hand, a situational attribution holds the conditions of the environment or the situation as responsible for the outcome.
Studies show that <u>situational attribution is more common when judging our own outcomes</u>, especially when negative.
I think my answer is C, because government have too much power to control over farmers
<h2><em>what statements are always true about limiting reactants?</em></h2>
- <em>The limiting reactant is completely used up in the reaction. The limiting reactant dictates the amount of product. There will be an excess of other reactants at the end of the reaction.</em>
<em>hope </em><em>it</em><em> helps</em>
<em>#</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> learning</em>
<em>Sana </em><em>nakatulong</em>
Answer:
I write a lot about the importance of self reflection--especially come the end of the year. This is the time when, more than ever, it's important to take a step back and look hard at what's been working, what hasn't, and what you can do differently in order to effectively move forward and become successful.
What most people forget though is to audit all pillars of their life. As much time and attention you give your business or your work, you also need to give to your physical body, your emotions, etc. We are humans--we are not robots. And of course it's not always easy to ask yourself, "Have I been happy lately? What do I need to do to improve my emotional well being?" But being aware of all aspects of you is what creates balance--and staying balanced is what allows you to play the long game.
