Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
Compared to its rivals, Carnegie Steel is able to offer its goods for less money. Because he controlled the raw material supply, the means of manufacturing, and the channels of distribution, Carnegie was able to reduce expenses.
<h3>
What cost-cutting measures took Carnegie?</h3>
He promoted bonds and made investments in oil and railroad sleeper carriages, but iron production was his main line of work. He relentlessly adopted practices that reduced per-unit costs, introduced the railroad industry's cost-accounting methods, and hired skilled chemists.
Because he controlled the raw material supply, the means of manufacturing, and the channels of distribution. Because Carnegie produced a subpar item, production costs were lower.
Hence choice 2nd is correct.
Learn more about Carnegie Steel :
brainly.com/question/1403856
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is Dunkirk.
Explanation:
British troops were right near the Belgium-France border where the Germans encircled them through the Ardennes Forest.
Explanation:
Based on the period between 1999 and 2008, both rice and wheat yields are languishing on more than one-third of the world's harvested.
please follow me
<span>Hugh B. Patterson was the publisher i don't quite remember the newspaper sorry.</span>
