The difference between rats and de-miners is that <u>C. </u><u>Rats sniff </u><u>out </u><u>explosives</u><u>, but</u><u> de-miners</u><u> use metal </u><u>detectors</u><u>.</u>
<h3>Using rats to find mines </h3>
- Rats can be trained to use their superior senses of smell to sniff out landmines.
- They don't get blown up because they are too light.
Humans on the other hand, have to use metal detectors to find the mines which can make them slower and more prone to danger.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on training rats at brainly.com/question/6003136.
Answer:
Methodology
.
Explanation:
When she conducts studies into the impacts with various advertising strategies. She records almost all of those actions she had taken to complete the document in one segment of her study. Thus, each segment offers an illustration of such a methodology. That's why the following answer that is methodology is the correct according to the following scenario.
Answer:It's through our votes that we create our future. If one vote without any responsibility it will put us into a dark future. One should vote wisely which will help the nation.
One should feel privileged to live in a democratic country. Enfranchisement is the only thing which makes India the largest democratic country in the world.
Enfranchisement refers to the right to vote through which people vote for the suitable candidate and get rid of ill events that hamper their own country. By using the right of vote people can change the government who is not administering the nation progressively and honestly.
In India's states people change the government when the elected government is not up to their expectations.
In some cases, people misuse their right to vote. One should use its right to vote wisely and promote democratic values. Not to vote is not an option, one should always go and vote.
One should utilize its right to vote for a right leader which rises above the narrow ideologies of color, caste, religion, and creed.
Explanation:
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were two important leaders of the Black community in the United States. However, they each had very different opinions about the role of the African community, and on how equality could be achieved.
Booker T. Washington believed that the Black community needed to adopt a philosophy of self-help, racial solidarity and accomodation. He believed that African Americans had the duty to educate themselves and improve their livelihood in order to be taken seriously by white Americans. On the other hand, W.E.B. DuBois believed that this approach only put an extra burden on black people, while ignoring the responsibilities of whites. He argued that social change had to come through political change, and advocated political action.
I believe that their differences were as substantial as the friction between their followers. The two men had very different opinions about race and advancement. Moreover, I believe that the opinions of Booker T. Washington were more suited to the temper of the times as he took a more positive view of white people and a more negative view of conflict and political activism.