Answer:
0.3
Step-by-step explanation:
another person put that and everybody scored him 5 stars so im pretty sure its 0.3 for Plato users
Answer:
7..the way you worded the options was confusing
Since the second line is parallel to the first, it will have the same slope. The y-intercept of the new line is 4 (because of the coordinates given) so the equation of Lynda's second cut is y = 1/4x + 4 which is choice C
If 68 is a prime number, then the only factors it has are 1 and 68.
If it has any other factors besides 1 and 68, then it's NOT prime.
Right away, without any higher math, you can look at just the last digit
in 68 . The last digit is '8'. That tells you that '68' is an even number,
and THAT tells you that '2' must be one of its factors. So '68' is not a
prime number.
The factors of 68 are 1, 2, 4, 17, 34, and 68 .
68 has four more factors besides 1 and 68, so it's not a prime number.
Hello again! So we will be using the pythagorean theorem (

) to solve for the bottom leg of the triangles. After we do that, we'll subtract the value of the legs from 31, and that'll be x.
Plug in 17 and z (or any variable that isn't x) into the leg variable and 19 into the hypotenuse variable, and from there we can solve.

Solve the exponents to get

Subtract 289 on each side to get

Lastly, square root each side of the equation and your answer should be

(To get more accurate answers, you shouldn't round until the end of the problem)
Nextly, we will need to subtract

from 31. And since there are 2 triangles, you'll need to multiply

by 2.
In short, x = 14.0