How were state constitutions helpful to the writing of the U.S. Constitution? If answered first, and correctly, will mark BRAINL
IEST!!!! A.
Most states had learned that having a strong central government was a mistake.
B.
The state constitutions contained no guaranteed rights, so the authors of the U.S. Constitution left them out.
C.
Small and large states readily agreed on how to set up a national legislative body.
D.
The authors of the state constitutions had learned lessons that were useful in writing a new U.S. Constitution.
<span>The state constitutions helpful to the writing of the U.S. Constitution because </span>C. <span>Small and large states readily agreed on how to set up a national legislative body.
</span>The state constitutions before the US constitution made big mistakes. For example, before the US constitution, they created the Articles of confederation. It didn't have an executive branch, so they couldn't enforce/carry out laws. They didn't have a judicial branch, so they couldn't settle disputes between states.
The legislative branch itself serves as a check for the executive and judicial branches. It does this by being one out of three branches of the government through which power is shared and dispersed equally. Is that what you were asking for?
Well The british were wanting to make laws and make Americans do what they wanted them to and finally The Americans stood up and fought against it they wanted to be independant!
One of the factors that contributed to the downfall of both the Inca and the Aztec empires was their "<span>a. lack of a natural immunity to diseases that the Spanish brought with them from Europe," since it was germs that actually killed more people than weapons. </span>