Rational decision simply means a decision based on logic. It would be logical to say that people would always prefer more benefits than the cost they will be expending. Rational decisions indeed<span> occur when the marginal benefits of an action equal or exceed the marginal costs. No person would make a decision that would incur a loss in his part. Therefore, in order to say that you were able to have a rational decision, you have to bear in mind the profit you can gain out of it. Example of this is the decision on additional worker. Suppose you are paying $20</span><span> per worker and they produce 5,000 units. If you are to add additional worker, you will incur an additional $20 but it will also increase the production output to 8,000 units. Therefore, it would be a rational decision to employ another worker since the benefits would exceed the cost.</span>
The scenario given above is an example of criterion
validation. The criterion validity is a way of measuring an outcome related to
it or it is a way of having to gain statement about a behavior of an individual
and what would likely be the result base on his or her answers.
By having three separate, independent branches of government (the executive, legislative and judicial) a society has a "balance of power" which means that no one branch can have too much power and become tyrannical. Therefore each of the three branches is compromising.
Answer:
Quid pro quo harassment
Explanation:
Quid pro quo harassment is a type of harassment in the workplace that requires the harassed person(employee or potential employee) to offer something(sex) to get an appointment(in the case where the person is yet to be employed) or get promoted to a higher role( in the case where a person is employed already in the organization) in the organization.
Benedict Arnold's downfall was betrayal. He betrayed George Washington by giving information to the British during the Revolutionary War.