Answer:
Chief Justice Roger Taney declared Missouri Compromise to be illegal and unconstitutional.
Explanation:
The Missouri Compromise seen was a crucial agreement to balance the power in Congress between slave and free states. The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to settle the dispute. As a result, it banned slavery in the north (Louisiana territory) from the southern line of latitude 36 degrees 30'. It was during The Dred Scott v. Sandford judgment by the Supreme Court found that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. Roger Taney affirmed that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because Congress had no authority to forbid slavery in territories. To justify his statement, he mentions about the Fifth Amendment that gives citizens (slave master) a right to have property rights.
Answer: Foot-in-the-door (FITD) mechanism
Explanation:
Foot-in-the-door mechanism is defined as the technique that followed by people to make others agree on a major or larger request by initially starting to make others agree on smaller request.This type of persuasion technique creates link between persuader and respondent.
This is a compliance method for persuading and making them agree upon the desired request. Respondent's negative reply on large request in this case is usually related with the slamming of door on the face.
It would be cheaper in 2013 because 1$ is worth more rupees. Another reason might be because the tablet is an old product and is worth less.
It can’t make you breakfast
