1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ronch [10]
3 years ago
7

Why does Franklin choose not to sign the first papers he submits for publication? 4. Why does Franklin leave Boston? How old is

Franklin when he arrives in Philadelphia? 5. What is Franklin’s condition when he arrives in Philadelphia? 6. What thirteen virtues does Franklin feel are necessary for moral perfection? How successful is Franklin in carrying out his plan?
History
1 answer:
Over [174]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. Because if his brother finds out it is him, then he won't publish his papers.

4. Because his brother told every printer not to hire Franklin.

5. He was exhausted and had no money .

Explanation:

The rest two parts will be added once i figure out the answer.

You might be interested in
What are two religions that developed out of Hinduism
sukhopar [10]
Sikhism and buddhism were emerged from hinduism
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Document A: Newspaper
mojhsa [17]

Regarding the source, we can comment on the following.

  • Because you forgot to attach the article, we do not know the content of it. However, we gladly can comment on the following general terms.
  • The source of información has to be valid, and you have to cite it in your article.
  • The validation of your article depends on the proper primary and secondary sources you cite as part of your arguments.
  • That is the reason why the sources for the article influence the content of the article.
  • Good sources mean a solid argument and more interest on the part of your readers.
  • Bad or questionable sources mean that your article won't have the credibility needed to be accepted.

We conclude that is very important for the writer to include reliable primary and secondary sources in his article to impact the audience.

Learn more about this topic here:

brainly.com/question/336747?referrer=searchResults

4 0
2 years ago
Explaining According to Innocent III, what actions were French authorities to take against heretics? What reason did he give for
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

Banishment and confistication of properties. His reason was treason.

Explanation:

In his second year as pope, Innocent faced the problem of heresy in Christianity. He referred to the heretics as people who were committing treasons against God.

for people to be spiritual disciplined he called on church authorities to use excommunication. Banishment and confistication of properties were also used against the heretics of the Albigensian and Waldensian movements.

His reasons were that the traitors were committing treasons against God and were offending divine majesty.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Freedmen’s Bureau was disbanded for what reason?
balu736 [363]

Answer:

The southern states blocked funding

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why didn't Italy take part in the exploration of new trade routes
    5·1 answer
  • Describe what happened in Kansas that led newspapers to write about ''Bleeding Kansas.''
    11·1 answer
  • How were the motivations for settling the present-day United States both similar to and different from the motivations of the ea
    15·1 answer
  • Who led north Vietnam
    6·1 answer
  • Select the best answer for the question.
    8·2 answers
  • How did Johannes Kepler change the world or society?
    13·1 answer
  • Which religion allowed women to preach and
    11·2 answers
  • 7. Select a tone (or multiple tones) from the list of Tone Words. Explain why this tone is the best way to describe this text in
    14·1 answer
  • HELPPP!!!<br> -<br> -<br> -<br> -<br> -Book // Wrapping up a little bit of trouble //
    8·2 answers
  • Do you think that the U.S. considers their own
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!