1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vredina [299]
4 years ago
9

Who killed king tut and why

Social Studies
2 answers:
Dmitriy789 [7]4 years ago
7 0
It’s unknown who killed king tut but research showed that he could’ve died from a blow to the occipital or from an infection from a broken leg
balandron [24]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Heres what i put

Explanation:

The Theory of Hormheb

  The king’s deputy, also known as Horemheb, may have been responsible for the death of King Tut. The possibility that King Tut was getting older and probably ready to take powers into his own hands may have contributed to his early demise. For many years it was believed that Hormheb guided King Tut in his royal decisions as a child. As King Tut grew older and became more independent he started making his own decisions without the aid of Horemheb. This new thinking might have upset him and he quickly saw his power fading away. This independence that King Tut was attaining might have upset him and could been the reason as to why he killed King Tut.

  Though Horemheb did not get the throne after King Tut’s death he did get it after Ay. Upon becoming the pharaoh he restored Egypt to its traditional tradition which was the worshiping of the many ancient gods. He moved his capital to Memphis and returned all the temples to their rightful priests. During his reign as pharaoh he removed any signs of Akhenaten’s religion.

  By his actions, many Egyptologists and historians strongly assume that Horemheb wanted to restore Egypt to its traditional ways. Although, in hindsight, it appears that King Tut was also leaning in the direction of restoring Egypt to the more habitual ways before his death—it might not have been fast enough for Horemheb though.

  Mohamed El-Saghir, head of Upper Egyptian Antiquities, believes that Horemheb could not have committed the murder of the pharaoh. Mohamed believes that because King Tut was restoring Egypt to its traditional ways, Horemheb would not have had any reason to kill him. He does find it interesting that Horemheb removed King Tut’s name from several items and replaced it with his. Even so, it’s still not enough evidence and most pharaohs always tried to outdo the pharaohs before them.

You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes the government of West Germany during the Cold War?
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

when in doubt go with the one that say both are correct

8 0
3 years ago
How long can you eat yogurt past expiration date?
Rudiy27
Yogurt is another dairy product that can be eaten even after its labels says "expired". Open tubs of yogurt will spoil much sooner than unopened ones, but sealed yogurt usually last one to two weeks past the expiration date. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
3 0
3 years ago
Why do people move to Mexico
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

For one, the cost of living is considerably lower than in America. The people are extremely welcoming and its safe. The climate and food is amazing.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
According to the textbook's culture and human behavior box titled "culture and the muller-lyer illusion: the carpentered-world h
Damm [24]

The answer is <u>"Müller-Lyer illusion".</u>


The Müller-Lyer illusion is an optical illusion comprising of an arrangement of lines that end in sharpened stones. The introduction of the sharpened stones influences one's capacity to precisely see the length of the lines. Like most visual and perceptual dreams, the Müller-Lyer illusion enables neuroscientists to ponder the manner in which the cerebrum and visual framework see and translate pictures. Craftsmen have likewise used the hallucination to extraordinary impact in their works.

4 0
4 years ago
Why were colonists so hostile to the new taxes the British imposed on them after the Indian and French war?
NISA [10]

They were hostile, because they felt they were not responsible for the British's debt. As they didn't have the same privileges, as the other British citizens. Ex: The colonists weren't allowed to vote. They saw no reason why they'd should pay it.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you hade a chance how would you create your own country?
    9·2 answers
  • Race and ethnicity are buzz words that people use when discussing:
    12·1 answer
  • Which segment of the American population would have been MOST supportive of the Tariff of 1828?
    11·2 answers
  • At day care, 3-year-old sara has learned that she has to wait her turn to ride on the tricycle rather than push another child of
    9·1 answer
  • The ___________________ was intended to keep Eastern European nations communist.
    15·2 answers
  • If you answer correct I will mark brainliest
    5·1 answer
  • What was the pelonnesian book called?
    6·2 answers
  • How did the Shang develop a Chinese language?
    5·2 answers
  • Oneperson is consumption of a product produced in the amount available for the other people is a characteristic of a ________ go
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME. I WILL MARK BRAINEST IF YOU GET IT RIGHT.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!