1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga2289 [7]
3 years ago
14

What would be the likely outcome if the courts and the criminal justice system did not treat cases differently simply because of

the offense involved
Law
1 answer:
sveta [45]3 years ago
3 0
The outcome would probably be that people that did serious harm wouldn’t get a punishment for their actions where as innocent people would get a punishment without a second thought.
You might be interested in
What was the most significant governmental action in the 1960s and 1970s to radically change the EMS situation?
Svet_ta [14]

Several Medical and Law experts gathered together and debated the formation of a new half government half privatized department to assist the Fire Department and Police in the field faster than the hospital could. In fact back then even experts debated to make a law that drivers must yield to emergency vehicles. However that law didn't become official until 1996 when a Paramedic was struck and killed by another vehicle.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not one of the three branches of the US CJS?
stepan [7]

Answer:

the answer is corrections

6 0
2 years ago
Select the correct answer.
spayn [35]

Answer:

c. mediation  

3 0
3 years ago
Give five significances of human property
Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

<h2>The right to property, or the right to own property (cf. ownership) is often classified as a human right for natural persons regarding their possessions. A general recognition of a right to private property is found more rarely and is typically heavily constrained insofar as property is owned by legal persons (i.e. corporations) and where it is used for production rather than consumption.[1]</h2><h2 /><h2>A right to property is recognised in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,[2] but it is not recognised in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.[3] The European Convention on Human Rights, in Protocol 1, article 1, acknowledges a right for natural and legal persons to "peaceful enjoyment of his possessions", subject to the "general interest or to secure the payment of taxes."</h2><h2 /><h2>Definition </h2><h2>Relationship to other rights </h2><h2>History </h2><h2>See also </h2><h2>Notes </h2><h2>References </h2>

<h2>External links</h2>

4 0
2 years ago
Why should females not be concerned about developing manly muscles?
allsm [11]

Answer:

Why shouldn't they?

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes Max Weber's theory about power?
    12·2 answers
  • The Bill of Rights consists of the first
    15·2 answers
  • 55 PTS!
    6·2 answers
  • How many members are in each chamber of Arizona's legislature?
    8·1 answer
  • I_______________ Hate_______ I ready. Heres your bonus tho?
    8·1 answer
  • What is an example of a mutual legal loophole in relation to public-private partnerships?
    12·2 answers
  • What role do committees play in the policymaking process?
    15·2 answers
  • The length of a rectangle is 5 feet less twice the width. The perimeter is 50 feet
    10·1 answer
  • Are federal agencies required to have rcr policies
    10·1 answer
  • Which policy could be used to increase energy efficiency across the electric sector?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!