1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
3 years ago
13

10 sentences, what are the benefits of talking out problems rather than going to court? What is the difference

Law
1 answer:
kap26 [50]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Mainly, the greatest benefit of solving problems outside the judicial system is the cost, since every judicial process necessarily entails a high cost, both in taxes, costs, fees, etc. In addition, the resolution time is much longer, since it involves a whole series of procedural steps that necessarily imply a passage in time, which can be avoided through an alternative resolution of conflicts.

Those means of alternative dispute resolution include, among others, mediation and arbitration. Mediation, on the one hand, involves a series of meetings between the parties in conflict, with the assistance of a specialist, the mediator, who seeks to bring the parties closer together and achieve the resolution of the dispute. On the other hand, arbitration implies that the parties in conflict abide by the solution proposed by an impartial third party, the arbitrator, who will decide according to the rules of law or equity, as appropriate.

You might be interested in
According to your study unit, what is the main reason that improved human relations skills may improve your grades
klio [65]
If you are friends with someone and they know you too well and they are the one marking your script I’m not sure they will blatantly want you to fail
7 0
3 years ago
The term ethics refers to accepted principles of right or wrong that govern the conduct of a person
maksim [4K]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is a true statement that the term ethics refers to accepted principles of right or wrong that govern the conduct of a person, the members of a profession, or the actions of an organization.

Ethical conduct means that one abides these principles and keeps to them. On the other hand, unethical conduct entails going against these accepted principles.

7 0
3 years ago
"Did the appellate court agree with the trial court's order that Case Western must issue a diploma to Amir Al-Dabagh
ohaa [14]

Answer:

NO

Explanation:

Al-Dabagh, a dermatologist, was said to have completed all the academic requirements at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) for him to become a medical doctor. They school did not give him the required certificate with series of cases brought against him for being unprofessional in his conducts.

Many times, he was found late, and that delayed the classes on several occasions. There are also times he was said to have put up inappropriate acts with some girls in his class and in another incidence, it was said that he rode on a cab and refused to pay afterwards. Though he denied all these, but that did not convince the university to shift ground.

There was a trial court judgment that he should be given the certificate he merited. CWRU decided to appeal the case further and the supreme court reversed the judgement made by the trial court, reaffirming the stance of the university.

5 0
3 years ago
In Engel v. Vitale, why did the courts rule that prayer in schools was unconstitutional?
weqwewe [10]
The prayer was considered a religious activity.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Boyd files a suit in a federal district court against Cathy. Cathy loses the suit, appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
ikadub [295]

Answer:

not required to hear the case.

Explanation:

The United States Court of Appeals  is also known as the circuit courts that are the intermediate appellate courts. The US courts of appeals are one of the most powerful as well influential courts in America.

In the context, Boyd flies a case against Cathy in the federal district court where Cathy loses the case. She then makes an appeal to the circuit courts or the United States Court of Appeals for a second circuit but she loses again. Now if Cathy moves to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and makes an appeal, the Supreme Court is not required to hear Cathy's case as she already made an appeal in the Court of Appeals of U.S. and The court has made his judgement.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Criminologists Richard Hawkins and Geoffrey Alpert Observe that the work of correctional officers is characterized by both
    7·1 answer
  • What are federal jails called?​
    13·2 answers
  • Por qué consideras que son diferentes las células de un organismo a otro​
    14·1 answer
  • How is the role of a prison guard relevant to the court and judicial process?
    6·2 answers
  • What's is this question answer it please
    9·2 answers
  • Vhat made Alexander Maconochie a good judge of prison life?
    10·1 answer
  • Why might a social epidemiologist study the mass media?
    12·2 answers
  • A state recently passed “fetal heart beat” legislation that prohibits abortions in cases where the fetus has an audible heartbea
    13·1 answer
  • What would the most difficult part of being a peace officer would be?
    13·1 answer
  • How do you start a negotiation?​
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!