Well, we could try adding up odd numbers, and look to see when we reach 400. But I'm hoping to find an easier way.
First of all ... I'm not sure this will help, but let's stop and notice it anyway ... An odd number of odd numbers (like 1, 3, 5) add up to an odd number, but an even number of odd numbers (like 1,3,5,7) add up to an even number. So if the sum is going to be exactly 400, then there will have to be an even number of items in the set.
Now, let's put down an even number of odd numbers to work with,and see what we can notice about them:
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 .
Number of items in the set . . . 8 Sum of all the items in the set . . . 64
Hmmm. That's interesting. 64 happens to be the square of 8 . Do you think that might be all there is to it ?
Using correlation coefficients, it is found that that the correct option is given as follows:
The correlation would stay the same because the change in units for time would have no effect on it.
<h3>What is a correlation coefficient?</h3>
It is an index that measures correlation between two variables, assuming values between -1 and 1.
If it is positive, the relation is positive, that is, they are direct proportional. If it is negative, they are inverse proportional.
If the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.6, the relationship is strong.
The correlation coefficient does not have units, hence if the units of the measures is changed, the coefficient remains constant, which means that the correct option is given by:
The correlation would stay the same because the change in units for time would have no effect on it.