Answer:
b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.
I don't know what method is referred to in "section 4.3", but I'll suppose it's reduction of order and use that to find the exact solution. Take

, so that

and we're left with the ODE linear in

:

Now suppose

has a power series expansion



Then the ODE can be written as


![\displaystyle\sum_{n\ge2}\bigg[n(n-1)a_n-(n-1)a_{n-1}\bigg]x^{n-2}=0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%5Csum_%7Bn%5Cge2%7D%5Cbigg%5Bn%28n-1%29a_n-%28n-1%29a_%7Bn-1%7D%5Cbigg%5Dx%5E%7Bn-2%7D%3D0)
All the coefficients of the series vanish, and setting

in the power series forms for

and

tell us that

and

, so we get the recurrence

We can solve explicitly for

quite easily:

and so on. Continuing in this way we end up with

so that the solution to the ODE is

We also require the solution to satisfy

, which we can do easily by adding and subtracting a constant as needed:
Answer:
the factor of 25 is : 1, 5, 25
1234567891011121314151617181920