Answer: This is an example of "THE THIRD VARIABLE PROBLEM".
Explanation:
Third Variable Problem is a type of confounding where we use a third variable to make a relationship between two others. This third variable problem always tends to be a mistaken identity towards a course.
Because the research has assumed the activiness of children who eat more such, when compared to the children who eat less sugar to be caused by metabolism rate without any Experiment, but has chooses to prove his point with a known Experiment, on children children who eat more food when compared to children who eat less food. This is a third party problem, because he has choose to conclude the result of two variables ( activiness of children who eat less sugar Vs children who eat more sugar) with an unrelated variable( food metabolism in children).
Answer:rationalization
Explanation:
Psychology and logic,defines rationalization or rationalisation occurs when a controversial behavior is rationally explained in order to make logic to anyone and be easily tolerated , it also associate with informal fallacy of reasoning.
Claiming to be able to find someone a perfect match may seem a bit unbelievable and to make it rational and logical they give a reason why one should trust this by saying they use compatibility information.
I think the answer is C, I’m not quite sure . Please tell me if I’m right?
Answer:
because of religion.........
The conclusion of this is that death penalty should be abolished. nobody has the right to take life apart from the cycle of nature itself or God. Even the individual has no right to take out their life.
The main aim of sentencing a person is to offer correction measures and death is not one of them.
this is however contentious because some hardened criminals have their victims baying for revenge, and death is one of their desires.