Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer: captian john Smith
Explanation:
Captain john Smith was a leader for southern colonies
I think it would be a settlement sorry if I’m wrong
<span>Technology is the practical application of principals goveren by scientific law that in turn is derived through observation and experimentation to prove scientific theory.</span>
September, 28 1066. Hope this helped
