<h3>
Answer:</h3>
- A
- B
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
1. A decrease of 3.8% is equivalent to a multiplier fraction of -0.038. The only answer choice that has such a multiplier is A.
In an instance such as this, the "rate" is usually some (fractional) change in some period of time. Since the exponent must be unitless, the rate is effectively (some fraction) "per year" so that multiplying by "t" years cancels the units and results in a pure number.
___
<em>Comment on the exponential</em>
If the actual change were -3.8% per year, the exponential term would look like (1 - 0.038)^t = 0.962^t. By writing it as e^(-0.038t), the decrease is effectively compounded continuously. As a result, over a year's time, the decrease is actually about 3.73%, not 3.8%.
_____
2. If ║x/2║ is a magnitude function, answer choices B and D are equivalent. Thus, we must assume it is a "greatest integer" function. Then the number of desserts prepared will be ║x/2║, and the corresponding revenue will be 1.2║x/2║. Since x is in minutes, 2 to 4 hours will be 120–240 minutes. The appropriate choice is B.
Answer:
The second answer, and possibly the first answer as also true.
She did run a test that would indicate its an unbalanced dice, but this wasn't tried out with a different person throwing the dice.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because from the computer generator results we see 11 of the 25 values are estimating at 1/5 when we know dice are 1/6 and more than 1/2 show just under 1/5 which balances this to be 1/6
But there are 9/25 tests that showed values under 10 throws found a 6 in 9/25 events = 1/3 approx out of 1/10 of the throws, and 1/3 is still a higher value than 1/6 of the multiple throws so indicates 100 throws would not be enough to tell as we cannot possibly assume her results are comparable with a computer generator.As the computer generator completed 25 x 100 throws and have just compared only x10 in relation to 1/10 of the events of the generated computer. This showing 9 of the 25 (100) throw events in relation scores 1/3 of the results a 6. The answer is she would need to throw somewhere between 1000 and 3000 to compare to the computers results.
Step-by-step explanation:
Line A : x + y = 2
The most likely equation for line B so that the set of equation has no solution is:
x + y = 4
====
x + y = 2
x = 2 - y
2-y + y = 4
0 = 4 - 2
0 ≠ 2
there is no value for x nor y. so, no solution.
Answer: 9b - 8b
Step-by-step explanation:
ou need two factors that you will multiply together to give you -72b^2 and at the same time when you add this two factors it will give you + b . Check; 9b X -8b = -72b^2 and 9b + (-8b) = b , that is why 9b and -8b are the factors and they will replace the middle value
