I can imagine the following scenario:
People were eating some good crops and threw the seeds next to their settlement, then they saw that this made the plant grow in that place and continued placing the seeds there. Often they could actually see that the plants actually grew from the seeds.
Answer:
the legal framework of a country reflects the rulers' dominant political ideology.
Explanation:
This is because, Collectivist-inclined totalitarian states will favour the practice and principle of giving preference to group over individuals in terms of government activities, which in this case, reflected in the government enacting laws that severely restrict private enterprises. While democracy through its principles and established practices, favours individualism, such as private enterprises and pro consumers. This shows that, the legal framework of a country reflects the rulers' dominant political ideology.
Baja peninsula is your answer have a good night
The Webster–Hayne debate<span> was a famous debate in the </span>United States<span> between </span>Senator Daniel Webster<span> of </span>Massachusetts<span> and Senator </span>Robert Y. Hayne<span> of </span>South Carolina<span> that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of </span>protectionist tariffs<span>.</span>
Answer:
A. Process of preparing the public to bring specific criteria to mind when evaluating a politician or issue.
Explanation:
In psychology, 'Priming' is a term used when referring a process of preparation through the input of a stimulus on an individual, expecting then results related to this stimulus.
Regarding the question, the public is being prepared for upcoming political events, and delivery of a specific set of opinions is expected as a result of this preparation. The process of preparation involves a stimulus being applied in the public, and a particular response is expected from them (their criteria), as both the stimulus and the result have a planned association.
