Answer:
Apollo's return on equity is 38.17%
Explanation:
The formula to compute the return on equity is shown below:
Return on equity = Net income ÷ total equity
where,
Net income = $50,000
And, the total equity is
= Common stock + retained earnings
= $10,000 + $121,000
= $131,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $50,000 ÷ $131,000
= 38.17%
Answer:
The size of the futures position should be 64.2% of the size of the company’s exposure in a three-month hedge.
Explanation:
As given,
The standard deviation of quarterly changes in the prices of a commodity = $0.65
The standard deviation of quarterly changes in a futures price on the commodity = $0.81
The coefficient of correlation between the two changes = 0.8
Now,
Optimal hedge ratio = 0.8×
= 0.8×0.80 = 0.6419
⇒Optimal hedge = 0.6419 ≈ 0.642 = 64.2 %
⇒The size of the futures position should be 64.2% of the size of the company’s exposure in a three-month hedge.
Yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixnine yyyymoneymancanudancetekashiesixninediideboppp
Even if people are speaking the same language, there can be <u>cultural differences</u> that affect communication. Certain words or phrases can mean very different things across languages.
In an ethnographic study of black and white working-class men, Deirdre Royster (2003) found that the job market was Not fair and not meritocratic
Explanation:
Deirdre Royster has put this popular wisdom to a test – revealing the subtleties and inequalities of a place of work in the Race and the Invisible Hand which favour the white person looking for jobs above the black one.
Royster is finding a reference in the stories of 25 black and 25 white men from the same vocational school who were looking for work on the same blue collar job market in the beginning of the 1990's.
Having carefully studied the professional successes, work ethics and values of Black men in the sense of particular deprivations, her research shows that young black and white men are the main differences— access to connections that are very relevant in job searches and admission.
