Answer:
c. $3,200 favorable.
Explanation:
We know that
Total controllable cost variance = Budgeted overhead cost - actual overhead cost
where,
Budgeted overhead cost = Variable overhead + Fixed overhead
where,
Variable overhead = 40,000 units × $2 = $80,000
And, the fixed overhead = $72,000
So, the budgeted overhead = $152,000
And, the actual one is $148,800
So, the total controllable cost variance would be
= $152,000 - $148,800
= $3,200 favorable
Return on Investment = 83% or 0.83
total Profit = 75000
term = 6 yrs
annual profit = 75000 / 6 = 12500
initial investment = 15000
ROI = Net Profit / Total Asset
= 12500 / 15000
= 0.83 or 83% (0.83 x 100%)
Answer:D.$14,100 gain
Explanation:
The par value of a bond is $100 when it's issued below the price it's issued at a discount which is a loss to the firm and when it's issued above the par value, it's issued at a premium which is a gain.
The issue of $705,000 means 7050 numbers were issued and retiring it $102 means at a premium of $2 per bond and a total of N14,100 gain.
Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
