All categories

3 years ago

Should an hco focus clinical measurement in an office of quality management?

1 answer:

6 0

<span>I believe it would be beneficial for an hco to examine an office of quality management. The reason being is that to have effective quality management you need competent workers in optimal mental and physical health. If quality management fails the health standards, then they will not be able to effectively lead a team.</span>

You might be interested in

Maddy works at Burgers R Us. Her boss tells her that if she stays with the company for five years, she will receive a bonus of $

Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

$4,038

Explanation:

Present value (PV) is the current value of a future sum of money or stream of cash flows given a specified rate of return. Future cash flows are discounted at the discount rate, and the higher the discount rate, the lower the present value of the future cash flows.

Present Value = Future Value x (1/ ( 1 + interest rate ) ^ number of periods)

Present Value = 6,000 x (1/ ( 1 + 0.08) ^ 5)

Present Value = 6,000 x 0.68058

Present Value = $4,038

4 0

3 years ago

Natalie owns a condominium near Cocoa Beach in Florida. This year, she incurs the following expenses in connection with her cond

kumpel [21]

Answer and Explanation:

Natalie's Gross Income = $10,000

75 + 35 = 110 days

Expenses:

Insurance Expense (75/110) x 1000 682

Advertising Expense 500

Mortgage Interest (75/110) x 3500 2386

Property Taxes (75/110) x 900 614

Repairs and Maintenance (75/110) x 650 443

Utilities (75/110) x 950 648

Depreciation (75/110) x 8500 5795

Until the depreciation expenses the total expenses accumulate to 5273. If we deduct that with the gross income total we get 4727. We can only deduct 4727 from the total portion of 5795 depreciation expense.

Therefore, for AGI deductions we take total of (5273 + 4727) = $10,000

For Natalie's personal deduction of AGI

Mortgage interest (35/110) x 3500 1114

Property taxes (35/110) x 900 286

Total personal deduction for AGI $1400

4 0

3 years ago

You are the manager of a firm that manufactures front and rear windshields for the automobile industry. Due to economies of scal

Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

a. The optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0)

b. Yes, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

Explanation:

a. Determine your optimal pricing strategy if you and your rival believe that the new Highlander is a "special edition" that will be sold only for one year.

Note: See the attached excel file for the Representation of one shot normal for of the game played between "You" and "Your Rival" together with the payoffs.

From the attached excel file, the dominant strategy is for “You” and “Your Rival” to charge “Low Price” each. If the dominant strategy is played by “You” and “Your Rival”, the optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0).

b. Would your answer differ if you and your rival were required to resubmit price quotes year after year and if, in any given year, there was a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander? Explain.

When we have a year-after-year competition between “You” and “Your Rival” but with a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander, the payoffs of the firm that continue to comply with the collusive strategy of charging “High Price” by each firm under the normal trigger strategy whereby “You” and “Your Rival” agree to charge high price as long as there is no past deviation by any of the firm, otherwise charge a low price is as follows:

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 + $6(100% - 60%) + $6(100% - 60%)^2 + 6(100% - 60%)^2 …….

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 / 6% = $10

Therefore, what the firm that cheats earn today is $11 million and it earns $0 forever. The implication of this is that $\pi ^{Cheat}$ = $11

Therefore, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

Download xlsx

7 0

2 years ago

Uber’s strategy has been to break these regulations, establishing its service first, and then fighting attempts by regulators to

aleksley [76]

Answer: No it is not.

Explanation:

Uber by first establishing itself and then fighting regulators leaves itself open to attack around the world. This is because the Regulators have the power to keep adjusting the laws that govern Uber if they feel that Uber has an unfair advantage or if it's existence is detrimental to the society. Uber has been accused many times of various infractions such as Tax Evasions and being a conduit through which crime can be committed because it did not conduct proper background checks.

Going back to the issue of taxes, if the regulators feel that Uber may be avoiding taxes, they could impose laws that either cause an increase in Uber prices or remove them from a location which can have a native influence on Uber's bottomline.

This approach is not good because regulators do not like being fought and will try to ascert dominance. It is simply not viable and this has been proven with Uber's many suspensions around the world.

8 0

2 years ago

Janet is planning to purchase the stock of Mortensen Petro, Inc. She expects the stock to pay a $1.98 dividend next year, and sh

Arada [10]

Answer: Current Price $26.65

Explanation:

Rate of return = 12.5%

dividends = $1.98

Expected Price (in a year from now) Pe= $28

Current price = Pc

R = (Pe - Pc + D)/Pa

0.1250 = (28 - Pc + 1.98)/Pc

28 - Pc + 1.98 = 0.1250Pc

-Pc - 0.1250Pc = - 28 - 1.98

- 1.125Pc = -29.98

Pc = -29.98/(-1.1250Pc) = 26.64888889

Pc = $ 26.65

7 0

3 years ago