F,c,because those are the really the things you look for in a John
We answer this question by bringing about the following supposition:
<span>The corrective tax policy and the number of pollution permits available do not change in spite of this demand shift.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below
Sales tax (($257,000 + $154,800) ×7%) $28,826
To sales tax payable $28,826
(Being the sales tax expense is recorded)
Here the sales tax is debited as it increased the expense and credited the sales tax payable as it also increased the liability
The calculation is as follows;
= $27,4990 ×100 ÷ 107
= $257,000
And,
= $165,636 × 100 ÷ 107
= $154,800
Answer:
a. $ 90,000 cost decrease
Explanation:
The computation in the change in the amount of differential cost is shown below:
= (Unit cost by ignoring the fixed cost) - (unit cost to manufacturing the purchase cost) × number of units purchased
= ($12 - $15) × 30,000 units
= $3 × 30,000 units
= $90,000 decrease
And the other information which is given in the question is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
