The existence of trade for country that has developed an expertise or reputation for quantity in the production of a particular good is best explained by <u>"acquired comparative advantage".</u>
A few business analysts make a distinction among natural and acquired comparative advantages. A natural comparative advantage exists inside a nation that has regular assets that are required to create an item, while a procured near favorable position is the favorable position picked up by an individual or a nation by investing a great deal of energy or assets delivering an item. For example, Saudi Arabia has a a natural comparative advantage with its tremendous stores of oil. (Saudi Arabia additionally has an outright favorable position in oil, since the expense of its extraction is not exactly somewhere else.) Since Saudi Arabia has couple of different assets, without exchange, it would be amazingly poor; in view of exchange, it is to a great degree affluent. Japan, then again, has couple of normal assets, yet it has an acquired comparative advantage in its assembling and business know-how, which it has created throughout the years.
Answer:
a. Observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing
Explanation:
As Richard owns and operates a small business at an outdoor market where he sells fruits and vegetables. UCC specifically require Richard with respect to his customers to treat them equally and fairly and he should not be involved in any kind of cheating and misleading the customers in any way and at any level. Customers should be proved with the quality and fresh fruits and vegetables at the reasonable mentioned and set prices.
Answer:
A. People creating different governments around the world
Explanation:
economics looks at how the world’s resources are used by and distributed among individuals and organizations.
When it has a strong demand from consumers and slightly more supply then it's demand. And of course, if the company is more famous, provides good quality service, and has little down peak of it's business.
I hope it helped you!
Answer:
59% - a)increase - b)decrease
Explanation:
First of all, we should say that the real exchange rate is calculated by multiplying the nominal exchange rate for the price index and then divide it by the price index of the other country. In another language, using this case as the example, the first nominal exchange rate is 50, as you need 50 rupees to buy 1 dollar. So to calculate the real exchange rate you need to multiply 50 by 100 (the price index of USA) and then divide it by 100 (the price index of India). Note that both price indexes are 100, just a coincidence for making easier the question. Result: 50.
Then we calculate the next real exchange rate: multiply 60 (the new nominal exchange rate) by 106 (the new US price index) and divide by 80 (the new India price index). This throws a result of 79,5. We see a 29,5 increase, and 29,5 represents 59% of 50 (the initial real exchange rate).
Then both questions is more common sense than the reading of the results we just calculated. For example, nominal exchange rate changed from 50 to 60, so the people in India will now have to collect 10 more rupees to buy the same dollar. Let's suppose a pair of shoes in USA costs 40 dollars. Before, Indians needed 2000 rupees to buy it. Now they will need 2400 rupees... it will be more expensive. Plus, the prices of USA had gone up 6%, which means the pair of shoes will now cost 42,4 dollars... even more expensive! As products in USA are more expensive, we can expect that India's consumption of American goods will decrease (law of demand).
With the American consumption of Indian goods happens the opposite, the goods in India became cheaper (price index has fallen), and for the Americans, the same dollars they had will buy more rupees when the exchange rate changed to 60.
