Since the two codons are for the same amino acid, the mutation doesnt change the phenotypes.
Answer and Explanation:
Observing population directly gives you accurate result .
Direct observation does not need any intermediary as they themselves go for survey.
So, it is cost efficient.
Whereas indirect observing may involve manipulations.
It requires someone or many to hire who helps in surveying.
It incurs cost.
Thus, direct observation is always better than indirect observation.
Answer:
its pink i promise it is pink
About 10% because I know about 90-95% of DNA is junk DNA(doesnt perform serious function)
It spread by person to person
