<span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.
Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.
Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
Answer: for discrimination
Answer:
enumeration technique
Explanation:
Enumeration is a technique used in speech, a rhetorical device, for listing details or components of a thing in the form of mentioning words or phrases step by step. In this way a subject is further buttressed. Speakers and writers alike use enumeration to elaborate on a topic, and make it much clearer for the readers, avoiding ambiguity.
My answer is D: Elected officials will likely pay more attention to messages that come from a group of people.
My reasoning for this is that government officials usually pay attention to a group of like-minded people with the same opinions or etc. on a specific topic especially if the said group has interests in supporting them. It also the only option that makes the most sense, logically speaking.
Hope this helps! :)
